Thursday, May 11, 2006

Republican Rumble In Springdale Tonight!

Senator Jim Holt will be debating Chuck Banks and Doug Matayo in Springdale tomorrow at the Springdale Holiday Inn!

Here are the details:

What: Washington County Forum

When: Thursday, May 11 at 7:00 PM

Where: Springdale Holiday Inn

Who: Lt. Governor Candidates: Senator Jim Holt, Chuck Banks, and Doug Matayo.

State Senator Candidates Dist. 35: Jim Bob Duggar, Bill Pritchard (For the seat currently held by Jim Holt).

State Representative Candidates Dist. 93: Jon Woods vs. Kathy McFetridge.

48 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

That would be "state representative' Doug Matayo.

11:01 AM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or even "State Represenative" Doug Matayo.

11:03 AM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I meant "State Representative" Doug Matayo.

11:04 AM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Or if you want to be real accurate: "Future Lt. Governor Doug Matayo". That has a nice solid ring to it doesn't it?

11:45 AM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There Mark Moore goes again with his bias!

12:05 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Senator Jim Holt will be debating Chuck Banks and Doug Matayo in Springdale tomorrow at the Springdale Holiday Inn!"

In order for Jim Holt to debate Chuck Banks and Doug Matayo, he first needs to learn how to debate. He is horrible at debating and Banks and Matayo will chew him up and spit him out. Can't wait!

1:35 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I heard thru the grapevine that Doug is ready for the debate. Father Huckabee was in town and has him ready. He also told Doug that he couldn't be there but would be praying for him. Sounds like a father and son relationship to me.
XXXXXXXXXXXXX OOOOOOOOOOOOO
Good Luck tonight Dougie
MH

1:54 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1:54 Do you EVER feel bad after you lie or are you just so used to it that you have no feelings anymore?

2:46 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:46 LIE ABOUT WHAT? I'm not the one telling the lies. Everyone knows that Doug Matayo is a Huckabee yes man. Can you deny that one? Doug can't think for himself and he got caught up with Huckabee and the rest is history.

3:03 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And your jealousy is all but dripping off my computer. There really is no sense in complaining about a man with a 70% approval rating. It makes you sound like a whiny baby. Which part are you offended by, the part that he would visit NWA or the part about praying? Because I can see how the praying bit might offend you.

3:11 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:03 Your whole statement was a lie, except for the part about Doug being ready. That was the only part you didn't lie about.

3:21 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who said anything about praying. I must have missed that one. Do you know how to pray? I don't think so.....

XXXXXXXXXXXXX OOOOOOOOOOOOo

PS: Look who is jealous, certainly not me. Doug better be ready. I will be there tonight and I will let you know tomorrow how many times that he says "me" or the Govenor

3:49 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gov's call for prayer to end the drought was at the same time the rains started, so that indicates the line upstairs is still open for the gov.

5:11 PM, May 11, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

1:54 brought up praying. Maybe you should learn to read.

6:26 AM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The 1:54 comment was what led me to mention that the Guv's prayers still get through. Maybe you should learn to comprehend.

7:04 AM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Who said anything about praying. I must have missed that one"

I was answering THAT person. I'll say it again, maybe you should learn to read.

8:31 AM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

50 times "me" and at least 25 times "the Gov. and me"
it took about 5 minutes into the debate for him to start talking about "me" and Mike

3:55 PM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:55PM Try doubling those numbers for Holt. How many times did we have to listen to his days in the NSA or whatever it was. I did this, I did that, I learned this, I,I,I.

7:34 PM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I heard Matayo ended up in the hospital after the debate. Heard he dislocated his shoulder patting himself on the back.

8:40 PM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:40 - A little jealous?? He did great, head and shoulders above the rest, and got plenty of compliments from Holt supporters. But he never bragged.

Get over it and send him some flowers.

9:22 PM, May 12, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The hospital got a little excited Thursday night. They were having a terrible time trying to set his arm while his head was up Huckabee's tail.
They said that he will recover, but needed a little air.

1:09 AM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

9:22 I'm sure he got some comments from HOLT supporters. They took over the room. Holt supporters every where.
I'm certainly glad to see that you have learned how to spell "I". Big word for such a small mind.

5:32 AM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:32AM There were a lot of Holt supporters there, too bad they weren't all voters. The Holt and Duggar children amounted to 27, take them away plus the children of some of his supporters, and that doesn't leave many actual voters. You people really like to stretch the truth. Matayo had just as many voters there, if not more.

7:36 AM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

5:32AM Sorry but I don't see an "I" in 9:22's comment, now who has the small mind?

7:41 AM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:36 Was right on. It was kind of hard to hear the debate with babies crying and children running around asking for more pretzels. Anyone ever heard of manners? Children and debates don't mix. Leave the children home so the adults can listen to the candidates without all the distractions. But without all the children, Holt would've only had 5 supporters.

11:12 AM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only reason that the Matayo's three children weren't there is because they were locked up in a room at home alone. Their babysitter was there....The children were very well behaved. I didn't see anyone complaining. I'm a registered voter and I could hear every word that was said. No problem. Just because you can't control your children you should complain about other peoples children. Now Emily, take that. You could take lessons from the Holts, Duggers and other families that know how to take their children out in public and not be ashamed of them. Talk about manners you could use a few of them yourself. You have no clue that I met you Thursday night and I was not impressed at all.
Try smiling sometimes. It sure would help your personality.

2:48 PM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:48PM You obviously don't know the person you so rudely called out, since that person posted anonymously. If you knew the person, I think you are talking about, then you would know that person smiles all the time. You were also very rude and cold to talk about their children that way since you don't know them. Are you so hateful to believe the Matayo's would lock their children up alone? How spiteful and jealous can you be?!?

The babies were crying, the children were moving around, they were not loud. No child belongs at a debate where they could hear their father critized in some way.

8:06 PM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, Chandler, take that.

8:25 PM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:55PM Not hard to figure out who you are. Probably the person in the back with a video camera?

8:25 PM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

2:48 You are out of your mind. I'm sorry that you feel the need to lie constantly, but if it makes you feel better then keep it up.

I'm sure the Matayo's don't take their children to political events because they are looking out for their children's best interest. They put their children's needs above their own and don't use them for political gain. I'm not Emily, but I was there the other night, and I know for a fact that you did not meet her. If you had, you would know that she is the friendliest person and is ALWAYS smiling. I saw her smile at Michelle Duggar several times and then commented to me that she thought Michelle had the face of an angel.

I was actually sitting right in front of a lady with a baby that cried the entire time and her other children were asking for food the whole time. Obviously you weren't sitting where I was sitting. It was my first time at a debate and I was very disappointed that it was so distracting with all of the kids. And there were about 30 Matayo supporters there that had about 50 children between them and they all were able to leave them at home with a sitter. Are you going to call all of them bad parents? Those 50 children are the most loved and well behaved children you will EVER meet. None of those parents need to take parenting lessons from anyone. I have a feeling that you have never met any of those parents or children, so you should stop making false accusations about people. Hopefully you will never get a chance to meet those children, because their parents are sensible enough to keep their children away from hateful, unstable people like yourself. Debates have a reputation for getting very heated and that is not something a child needs to see, especially when it involves their own father.

8:30 PM, May 13, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

HEY, YOU GUYS ARE THE ONES THAT STARTED THIS CRAP. IT HURTS TO HEAR THE TRUTH. WHY DON'T YOU SHUT UP ABOUT HOW MANY CHILDREN WERE THERE AND WHO'S CHILDREN WERE THERE. I WAS THERE ALSO AND I DIDN'T HEAR A BABY CRY. NOW IF YOU WANT TO GET DOWN AND DIRTY I CAN BE AS UGLY AS YOU CAN. WHY DON'T WE ACT LIKE ADULTS AND STICK TO THE ISSUES. I APPAULED THE DUGGARS AND THE HOLTS FOR BRINGING THEIR CHILDREN SO THEY CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR FATHERS DO. TOO BAD THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE ASHAMED TO BRING THEIR CHILDREN OUT IN PUBLIC. NOT CALLING ANY NAMES. I ALWAY TOOK MY CHILDREN WHERE EVER I WENT. IF CHILDREN WEREN'T ALLOWED THEN I STAYED HOME WITH THEM. I DIDN'T SEE A SIGN POSTED AT THE DEBATE "NO CHILDREN ALLOWED" NOW DON'T YOU AGREE WITH ME TO KEEP THE CHILDREN OFF OF THIS BLOG?

4:31 AM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"IT HURTS TO HEAR THE TRUTH" As a Holt supporter, you wouldn't know what the truth was if it bit you on the rear.

"TOO BAD THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE ASHAMED TO BRING THEIR CHILDREN OUT IN PUBLIC"

Wrong. Some of us happen to love our children and protect them from people like you. Some of us don't take our children with us to work so that they can know what their fathers do. A simple explanation is all that is required for them to understand. I don't see Wal-Mart headquarters full of children so that they know what their father does for a living. That was probably one of the dumbest responses I've seen.

"WHY DON'T WE ACT LIKE ADULTS AND STICK TO THE ISSUES." That is the first time I've ever seen a Holt supporter wanting to stick to the issues. If you wanted to stick to the issues you should've followed that rule from the beginning when that is what the rest of us wanted to talk about. The problem is that you don't have any issues to discuss because Holt is such a bad candidate.

"TOO BAD THAT SOME PEOPLE ARE ASHAMED TO BRING THEIR CHILDREN OUT IN PUBLIC" It has nothing to do with being ashamed of children, it has everything to do with respect for others. I guess that is something your parents didn't teach you. And when a child shoves a Holt sticker on you and then gripes at you for taking it off, it's obvious that respect is not a virtue that is taught to them. So when I see those same people at other events WITHOUT their children, I guess they were ashamed of them that day? My children go everywhere with me, except on those rare occasions when we will be out later than bedtime. Then I hire a sitter to make sure they get the rest they need. Parenting 101

6:22 AM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When the original comments were made, no one accused anyone of being a bad parent, or being ashamed of their children. This is when the hateful comments started:

"The only reason that the Matayo's three children weren't there is because they were locked up in a room at home alone."

"You could take lessons from the Holts, Duggers and other families that know how to take their children out in public and not be ashamed of them."

If you are sitting in church with your children, and your children start crying, it's polite to leave the room. If not you are distracting someone who could be hearing about Jesus for the first time. At the debate, the people there with children already had their minds made up. They crying baby could've been a distraction to someone who came to make up their mind who to vote for. If you don't leave the room, it's rude and that is where the manners come into play. I'm sure the Holt's and Duggars are wonderful parents, just like the rest of the parents there. It was rude of you to imply otherwise.

6:59 AM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Talk about all blow and no go. You Matayo lovers sure like to start crap, but when someone calls you on it then you start to get dirty. If you can't play with the big dogs then stay on the porch.

2:24 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Talk about all blow and no go. You Matayo lovers sure like to start crap, but when someone calls you on it then you start to get dirty. If you can't play with the big dogs then stay on the porch.

2:24 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, now you're just an idiot. Obviously you can't read and have no idea what the heck you're talking about.

3:52 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And you are the "big dogs". Are you even 18 yet? Sorry, but I'm laughing as I type this.

And here is the major difference between the Holt/Matayo camps as I see it:
Someone on this blog keeps referring to "Emily" as though they know for a fact that she is the one typing. They have also referred to her as the one who babysits the Matayo's kids. They have given her age and suppposed last name. To know that you would either 1. have to be tracking her computer or 2. have to be following her and the kids in some way. Both scenarios are immoral (at best) and illegal (at worst). So what I gather is that the Holt camp and this blogsite is engaging in some very questionable activities. That has been leveled before and has never been refuted--which speaks volumes. In contrast, I've never heard "Emily" calling anyone else out by name other than Mark Moore, whom everyone knows is Holt's campaign manager and blogs under his own name. So that tells me that the Matayo camp has no idea who is accusing them of such horrible things (such as locking their kids in a closet). Which leads me to believe that they are NOT having the Holt's every move watched and scrutinized. This whole thing is unbelievable to me.

Signed:
A former Holt supporter who can't believe how much they've changed.

3:53 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"HEY, YOU GUYS ARE THE ONES THAT STARTED THIS CRAP."

Actually, from what I've read on this blog and others, I believe Holt was the one who started all this "crap" when he called Matayo's wife and chewed her out months ago.

3:58 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

3:58 Holt sounds like a real gentleman there. I wonder if he treats his wife as bad as he treats other women? But what am I thinking? He does feel that women are the inferior sex.

4:05 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When did Holt call Matay's wife and chew her out? I would be interested to hear more about someone who would do that and why?

4:40 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

FYI I do know for a fact that Jim Holt and his family do not, I repeat DO NOT read this stuff. Why would they? They have a campaign to run and don't have time to mess with your minds. Maybe I'm just someone on here that gets my kicks from reading what you idiots are saying about Holt, Banks and Matayo. Have you even thought that far ahead. I don't think so. i might add that its working. HEHEHEHEHEHE

4:40 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:31AM: 9:22 brought up children when he mentioned all the Holt supporters there. Even though he didn't say children, they were included. He just didn't want to own up to the fact that most supporters there weren't voters. No child has been mentioned by name, as you all like to do with adults. If you are actually finding out real names, then you are illegally tracking their computers. From now on don't make claims that you can't back up.

4:51 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Holt and his family don't read this site, then why has his wife posted on here using her full name? Don't tell me she hasn't because I have read her defending her husband.

4:57 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:40 What in the heck are you talking about? Did you post on the wrong thread? You didn't make any sense. No one ever said that the Holt family reads this stuff, even though we know they do, we've heard them comment about it.

4:58 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:40 - Maybe I'm wrong, but I could swear that Mrs. Holt's mom posts on here all the time (under her own name, whatever it is.)

5:00 PM, May 14, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the above bloggers. I am Bobye Holt's mother and darn proud of it. I know that she has her hands full being a full time mother. Neither her or Jim read this terrible stuff. I do and I admit that I get pretty upset, but I have not posted under anonymous. I'm not ashamed of who I am. I chose to use my own name. I have nothing to hide. What they know about this blog is what I tell them and trust me they don't have time to worry about this stuff. They have both asked me not to read this stuff but I sometimes get curious just to see what everyone is saying.
I'm waiting for May 24th. to check this out again. I bet it will be a dead issue then.

3:22 PM, May 15, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting site. Useful information. Bookmarked.
»

3:25 PM, May 18, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. »

1:25 PM, February 14, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home