Thursday, March 08, 2007

Halter Pressing His Luck on Lottery

"Lt. Gov. Bill Halter challenged a House committee Wednesday to allow voters to decide on establishing a state lottery, whether or not the lawmakers opposed the idea. “What are you afraid of ?” Halter asked..."".

Sheesh! Talk about needing to brush up on how to win friends and influence people. There are lots of reasons not to forward the lotto amendment (besides a legislator's personal distaste for Lt. Governor Halter's demeanor in committee). The article by Laura Kellams is worth a read. It points out that the ledge can only refer three issues to the ballot. There might be more worthy ones to send up, after all the people have voted down gambling amendments before, and legislators have plenty of good proposals lined up for the three slots. Do we get to "choose again" until we come up with the answer the gambling interests want?

I refer you to an earlier article which explains why a lottery is an even less moral choice than prostitution. Perhaps someone will say the state should get into that business next in order to avoid "loosing revenue".

U of A Chancellor John White is focused on the amount of college scholarship money which could be funded with a lottery. Well and good, but teachers on the other end have to deal with parents who have lost the rent money gambling, and this will only make that worse. State sanction on gambling will only break down people's resistance to corrupting influences. It also adds to the wrong lessons our society teaches- that wealth is not won through hard and patience work serving others better than the next person, but through chance and luck or winning a lawsuit or being a rap "star". Enough of such false lessons, says the Watchblogger. A lottery is intrinsically anti-educational in this sense.


Blogger Brann said...

What do you make of the rumor that Halter is using the lottery for attention and plans to run against Mark Pryor in the primary? If Huckabee gets into the Senate race as well, it could be an interesting year for political animals.

10:44 AM, March 09, 2007  
Blogger Mark Moore (Moderator) said...

I think he wants out of Arkansas real bad and has an exaggerated view of himself. I think he will try it. I don't give either much of a chance against Pryor, but Halter is banking on winning a Dem primary that is far to the left of the general population. Pryor seems plenty left to me, but I know that is not how the far-left sees it.

What a miserable choice that would be for Arkansans should Halter upend Pryor in the primary and Huckabee was the Republican nominee.

11:45 AM, March 09, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not even Huck would dare run for senate after having announced a bid for the presidency.

12:39 PM, March 09, 2007  
Blogger GOPin08 said...

Yeah, that would be a race that I wouldn't vote in. Both Pryor and Huckabee are too liberal for me.

6:57 AM, March 10, 2007  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home