Sunday, November 11, 2012

Incompetence, or Something More Sinister from Benton County Election Officials?

“Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence.” ― Napoleon Bonaparte
Something went very wrong on Election Day in Benton County this past Tuesday.   I am not referring to my defeat as an Independent candidate for the state legislature, but rather the outrageously long lines suffered by the citizens of my home town, Pea Ridge.   Sure there were long lines everywhere, but as someone who had sign-waivers set up at ten polling places I was in a unique position to tell you how much worse it was at Pea Ridge.    The lines were long some other places, and shorter in others, but Pea Ridge was Ground Zero for the electoral fiasco of Tuesday's election.  People were still voting in Pea Ridge ten minutes until midnight.

Because I was standing in front of the polling place much of the day, I could pick a time when the lines were shorter, so it "only" took me two hours and forty minutes to vote.   My wife, sick with a cold, waited four hours in line in order to vote for me.   I repeatedly told her she should not vote, but being who she is, she insisted.  Many citizens, upon seeing the 100 yard long line out the door, turned away without voting.   I would estimate that hundreds who came to the polls in Pea Ridge that day left without voting.

The long lines suppressed voter turnout in Pea Ridge.  I am not claiming that the suppressed voter turnout was the difference in the race- it wasn't.    But it could have been, and that introduces the aspect of motive.    The County Election Commission, run by Republicans (and Democrats too, but my opponent was the establishment and I was the outsider), had both motive and opportunity to deliberately restrict voting opportunities in a voting location where I could be expected to poll stronger relative to my Republican (but liberal) opponent.

Of course, as the dead Frenchman quoted above indicates, the foul up in Pea Ridge could be a matter of simple incompetence.   Let's hope so, because it is absolutely essential to the continuance of our Republic that the population believes that our elections are conducted in a fair and even-handed manner.   The reason we are able to resolve our public issues peaceably instead of with the sort of violence we so often see in other nations is that our population accepts the legitimacy of election results.    Those who would try to play games with the conduct of our elections are committing the vilest sort of public crime, and in my view should be subject to the strongest possible punishment.     The people must have faith and goodwill as regards the management of our elections.  

Unfortunately, the decisions made by our County Election Commission defy innocent explanation.   We already know that there were multiple early voting locations in Rogers and Bella Vista, and of course in Bentonville.   There were no early voting locations in any small towns or more rural areas of the county.    You would think, if they wanted to give those of us in the small towns and rural areas an equal chance to early vote compared to our fellow citizens in the larger cities, that they could at least rotate an early voting location or two among the small towns.   When I mentioned this to a friend who lives in Texas, he laughed and said that he early voted- in a town of only 1,200 people.   Apparently our neighbors to the south don't just stack early voting locations in the big cities.

Then there is the issue of voting machine allocation.    If small towns are allocated zero machines in early voting, you might think they would be allocated a larger share on election day itself.   The opposite was true.  For example, the moderate sized precincts who voted at the Bella Vista Church on McNelley Road had five machines even though many Bella Vistans voted early.    The much larger Pea Ridge location only had four voting machines.     I understand that our local election officials asked the county election commission for more voting machines than the four they gave us, but were rebuffed.   This only lends credence to the theory that someone wanted long lines to reduce voter turnout in an area that might not vote for the candidate of their choice.

Lest you think that our sacred public officials would never stoop to such shenanigans,  I remind you that current 2nd District Congressman Tim Griffin was strongly linked to a voter suppression scheme called "voter caging" when he worked for the saintly Karl Rove.

But of course, if not enough machines were allocated, at least people could vote on paper ballots, right?  Wrong.    Only 100 paper ballots were sent to Pea Ridge, where almost 4,000 people are supposed to vote.  They were out of paper ballots by 10:00 AM.      The local election judges requested more paper ballots at once- and were later given about 30.

I am not sure if the Election Commission gets the blame for the lack of paper ballots.   Public officials seem to be pushing citizens away from paper ballots against our will.    Remember that firms make lots of money selling and servicing voting machines.   Voting machines have lobbyists, paper ballots do not.    Still, only 100 ballots available for almost 4,000 potential voters?    Voting machine can, and did, break down.   If more had broken down, it would have been a catastrophe to have so few paper ballots.

This does not even consider what has happened since election night.   Hand counting of ballots seems to be a lost art.   As of Sunday night, we still don't have certified totals.   But what really has me upset was my sick wife waiting in that line in the cold for four hours, along with my friends and neighbors.     The idea that someone might have put them through that out of some desire to hold down vote totals from my home town just infuriates me.    When you look at the facts, there was no good reason for it.  It was easy to see, as our home town elections judges saw, that Pea Ridge should have had more machines.   Maybe it was malice, or maybe, as Bonaparte said, it was merely incompetence.    I can't say for sure, but I don't have to know the answer to that to know this- someone on that election commission needs to go.

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is no doubt that the Republicans did it to you. They did everything they could to get Womack as the Rep here in 2010. He and Romney got the advantage of having a splintered vote among the conservatives and got a solid moderate Republican vote to himself as Scott got in your election. What happened in Pea Ridge is criminal and there should be criminal penalties for what happened there. If there is a traffic accident 20 cop cars can be there in 5 minutes, election voting problems? Depending on hat they are, who they are and where they are...they purposely don't care.

7:12 PM, November 11, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hate to hear that there were problems on election day. The Republicans need to get control of constitutional officers so we no longer have to deal with two democrats on the election commission in each county. I am sure you disagree since you just want to bash Republicans, I am so glad you got beat. You ran Jim Holts campaigns and that is enough to make me vote against you.

5:00 PM, November 12, 2012  
Blogger Mark Moore (Moderator) said...

I notice the insiders in each party seem to get along with each other a lot better than they get along with the outsiders in their own party. I have no problem at all envisioning a "bi-partisan" effort to help a very liberal "Republican" beat an independent. The people can't ever start thinking that they can have a government without these two private clubs running the show, now can they?

3:27 PM, November 13, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

No one conspired against you, your own wacky brand of politics worked against you. I said a long time ago I would never support anyone who helped Holt, Holt is an example of what is wrong with the radical, tea party sect that is a cancer in the soul of the Republican Party.

5:25 PM, November 13, 2012  
Blogger Mark Moore (Moderator) said...

And you know this how? I've laid out the circumstances. I've presented the facts. Is bald assertion your sole argument? You use the word "conspiracy" as if it was something that could never happen. Tell us then, do you believe that the Democrats conspired to steal votes in Ohio, where Obama got 99% and 100% of the vote, and where voter turnout was in EXCESS of 100%?

And if they could cheat there, why is it so hard to believe that the much more subtle tactic of arranging long lines by witholding the means to vote is so unbelievable? Hmm Mr. Anon? And please, while you are refuting all these facts, have the courage to put your real name on it.

39% of the voters were ready for an Independent, 61% were not. That percentage will only increase as Americans tire of the mismanagement/looting from the present two-party system.

My views were actually much more in line with the voters around here than Sue Scott's were, as a simple look at the voter's guide linked to on my site will verify. Too bad very few voters bothered to check that out.

Too many want to believe that all they have to do is pull the lever for their favorite letter. They think of their party as some Catholics see the Pope- as infallible. This is not a rational belief, but it is one that comforts them. They need not do anything but pull the right lever and they have done their duty. Such comforting delusions will be let go of, sooner or later.

8:32 AM, November 14, 2012  
Anonymous c.b. said...

Keep your head up, Mark!
I,for one, am proud of you. the path you chose wasn't the easy one. My only regret is that I don't live in your district. I would've stood in that four hour line to vote for you.... Twice if I had to!

12:06 PM, November 14, 2012  
Blogger Mark Moore (Moderator) said...

Many thanks CB!

10:44 AM, November 17, 2012  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you have any evidence that the election was stolen from you then please turn that evidence over to the local law enforcement. If not, as i suspect, please stop tearing down the legitimacy of the American electoral system. Both the Tea Party and the Occupy People have worked from opposite ends of the political spectrum to destroy the trust that is vital to the system. Grow up! If you were cheated and you have evidence then go after those who did it. If not then please shut up and crawl back in your hole with Jim Holt.

3:02 PM, November 19, 2012  
Anonymous you know who said...

I specifically said it made no difference in the results of the election. That is not what this is about. I could explain it again but then you are not interested. You only want the status quo defended no matter how poorly and unfairly they perform their duties. Do we even have a final official election count for Benton County, even now?

It's inexcusable, except for people like you who don't even attempt to address the facts laid out here, and instead rely on nasty personal attacks. Why is Benton County the last county in the state to have official election results? Why was Pea Ridge the last or next to last polling location in the entire state to finish voting?

So committed are you to the status quo that you appear to object to these questions even being asked, much less answered! And I notice that you still lack the integrity and moral courage to put your real name to your bile.

7:02 PM, November 19, 2012  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home