What I Would Have Said at the Candidate Forum, Question 8
Some of you may know that I filed for Lt. Governor as an independent
in an effort to
advance a lawsuit by Neighbors of Arkansas against the unjust
changes made in the law in 2013. These changes make it harder to get on the ballot as an independent. I will not be
on the ballot as part of the remedy, but I remain confident that the
law will soon be thrown out as unconstitutional. Similar laws have
in the past, and there is no way there can be “equal protection”
under the law when one's access to the ballot can be made harder
every time one attempts to access the ballot outside of the two
parties whose misrule has so harmed our nation.
During that process, before it was clear that our (three of us sued
as candidates, the other two for local offices) being placed on the
ballot was not going to be a part of the remedy, I held myself out as
a candidate. I even got invited to a forum. One co-hosted by the
El Dorado Chamber of Commerce and the Union County NAACP. This
forum is to occur on September the 30th. Since I went to
the trouble to answer the questions (in case access to the ballot
this cycle was still an option) I thought I might as well share my
answers with you. With that set up, here are the questions which
will be asked at the forum tonight and how I would have answered
them. If you don't think the system is broken, compare how I would
answer them by how they are being answered by the candidates that the
system is offering you.....
Question
8...
Violent
crimes are increasing, is there a proactive measure that can be
initiated during your term in office?
NICIC.Gov
says: The crime rate in Arkansas (2011) is about 34%
higher than
the national average rate. It is higher than any state except South
Carolina. Property crimes account for around 89% of the crime rate
in Arkansas which is about 33%
higher than
the national rate. The remaining 11% are violent crimes and are
about 39%
higher than
other states.
As I
studied and researched in order to give your question a proper answer
I tried to find a common thread. What did Arkansas and South
Carolina, the two states where apparently there is less respect for
private property and person, have in common? What is the common
thread? Then I remembered the GOP presidential debate in 2012. Ron
Paul was booed by an audience of people who claimed to be Christians.
His offense was that he cited the Golden Rule. There was a lot of
hypocrisy in that room that night, and there is nothing more
corrosive to moral character than hypocrisy. We will never have
enough cops and guns and prisons to restrain a population which is
without moral inspiration.
This
ties into everything else I have been saying about the way things
have been done in Arkansas. The people running the show have set a
very poor moral example for everyone else. When people see the
powerful getting whatever they can get no matter how they get it, it
makes them want to do the same. They may not be powerful enough to
enlist the government to help them loot like the insiders do, so they
use the tools that they have. If you want them to act better, you
need the people running the show to act better.
When
people are in Little Rock trying to form coalitions to loot everyone
else, how can you complain when people on the street form a coalition
to loot everyone else? The upper crust of one town puts on their
suits and ties and goes to Little Rock and tries to talk the
legislature into using government force to take money from other
towns and give it to them. They don't call it robbery. They call
it “economic development.” Street crime merely cuts out the
government middle man. When thugs pin you against the wall and take
your wallet, its not robbery. For them and their family, its
“economic development.” The answer is not in any of these
idiotic program proposals, the answer lies in the human heart. It's
a question of moral inspiration and it starts at the top.
If
you elected Mark ( a spokesman could have stood in for me) I guarantee you that he would help you set the moral
example that we need. Need I say. Because you can't build enough
prisons or hire enough cops to control a population without moral
inspiration.
**************************
Mark Moore is a proponent of a philosophy of government known as "Localism". In the end, it is either going to be globalism or localism, because no other view of government can protect its population from globalism. To learn more, check out Mark's book "Localism, a Philosophy of Government."
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home